Tuesday 21 April 2020

Book Review: Interrogating my Chandal life

Book: Interrogating my Chandal life
Author: Manoranjan Byapari
Translator: Sipra Mukerjee
Pages: 356


Inam ul rehman

A poor man holds unto no ideology except that of bread. It is the lack of bread that haunts
him and his family. But the burden of providing blood for any revolution, or change, is always on the poor men.

Manoranjan Byapari’s autobiography is a tale of few decades but it encapsulates centuries of oppression that the upper caste Hindus have wielded on their lower castes.

Byapari comes from the lowest caste of Hinduism, and as such is unschooled, and oppressed. He learns lessons of the life on the streets, through punches, humiliation, scares, cheated, stealing food from mongrels, every worse thing except never giving up on the life. He runs away from his family in order to work and feed them, but returns home dust handed a decade later cheated and duped by most of his proprietors. During his runaway a police official rapes him. Male rapes are underreported. No one wants it be reported, or speak a word on it. Byapari is not shy to say that he was raped in his preteens.

Byapari, in his autobiography, does not write scathingly on discrimination Hinduism does to lower castes rather he dispassionately writes a few sentences for those readers who are not familiar with it. His family is refugee from the then East Pakistan, and settle in Calcutta. Here they eat grass, frogs, snakes, whatever they can lie hand on. In trying to escape his grisly poverty he joins political party, and obviously the first party he joins is the Communist Party. But his delusion is short lived as he witnesses the ruthless face of it.

The Communist Party, according to him, massacred the refugees of East Pakistan. It was in the area called Marichjhapi where first the government forces cut off essential services to the people. Some who tried to smuggle essential things from rivers where drowned by “the speedy boats of the government forces”. He avers that the tigers of the Sundarbans forest became men eaters after government forces killed between 500-1000 lower caste Hindu refugees in the area, and let them rot there. Byapari says that when they came from East Pakistan as refugees the government provided them land at Dandakaranya, spread in Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh, but the same Communist Party advised them not to go to the “stony land”, and it will support them in being rehabilitated in Bengal itself. But when the same refugees demanded land for rehabilitation at Marichjhapi as promised by the CPI, the latter had no qualms in hunting them. He realises that be it Marxists, Congressmen, BJPian, it is the poor who fight and kill each other for their ideology.

Then he flings with the Naxals, or Naxals come to him. Here he questions why violence is necessary when they are not for succession, and demand only better life for the downtrodden. Revolutions had to take recourse to violence because, a Naxal leader tells him, “Nowhere would the ones in power sacrifice their privilege and position peacefully. Lives would be lost, lives would be sacrificed.” Not only the Naxals of the 60s and 70s had to face brutal retaliation from the state, but common people of the area faced the burnt with many killed in staged encounters.

Byapari also had to taste the cold walls of jail wherein he meets a sagacious person.  This person makes him to think constructively. Distraught with his life, Byapari feels he is doomed to live in jail forever. Here his sagacious friend inspires him to look things constructively. “The truth is,” he tells him, “ (h)e who searches, shall find. Men have been coming here ever since prisons were made thousands of years ago. Those who wept, died weeping. Those who survived were those who conquered their tears. And those who could laugh are part of our history.”

It is in prison that Byapari learns to read and write. He writes that in prisons rape accused are most hated by their fellow prisoners.  

After his release from the jail, once in an inebriated condition he delivers a fiery speech which brings him into the notice of Chattisgarh Mukhti Morch activists. It becomes important point in his life. He meets the CMM founder, Shankar Guha Neogi, who is a Marxist himself, but is considered a pseudo one because he critiques the then Soviet Russia. Neogi tells Byapari that his party’s slogan is “construct to destroy, and destroy to construct” but violence as a method to change the system is not viable. 

Byapari is surprised that Neogi is not just a leader but man committed to uplift the lives of people, particularly of labour class. “We are trying to break down a system. But if we fail to show the people the alternative system that we will build in its place, why would people be encouraged to destruction?” His discipline among his cadres is displayed when Neogi is kidnapped by the police so that he can be murdered, his cadres take a few policemen as hostages to protect their founder, the police fires on protestors killing 11 people, but his activists do not harm cops at all. Any guess who was ruling Madhya Pradesh then? Well, it was the BJP. The modus operandi of this party has not changed.  

Despite the then BJP government throttling every attempt of mass contacts by Neogi, the CMM calls for a meeting of all the workers of the Bhilai steel plant. The BJP government announces section 144, banning the meeting. But here the organisational skill of Neogi comes to fore. He shifts meeting to Raipur, almost 33 kilometres from where the original meeting was proposed, making all arrangements for their food, drinking water, medical facilities in case of emergency. His cadres walk down the roads of Raipur in three parallel rows each six miles long, making the meeting a grand success, and in the process annoying his capitalist rivals, who decide that if he stays in the political arena they may have to live a life of penury. Political and extractive class is never at peace with those who not only propose but show alternates to better life for the people, so Neogi must go. He is murdered, and then the government unleashes violence in his area scattering his cadres once for all. With Neogi gone the CMM never recovers from the blow.  Byapari is then again lost.

And once again his belly needs take him to work against the very ideology he was a proponent of.  He veers from one job to another, and at the end of the book he is a full time cook, but never gives up his writing.

This autobiography reinforces that it is the blood of the poor people that runs every revolution but the same poor people have to pay huge costs for this romance. And once this change, or reformation, takes place the poor are left to fend for themselves.

There is also mention of Kashmir when the purportedly relic of the Prophet (SAW) is stolen from Hazratbal Shrine leading to riots in Calcutta. 

Tuesday 7 April 2020

With pro-India, pro-Pakistan constituencies in Kashmir eroded India paves the way for radical ideologies


inam ul rehman

Politics is less based on morals and more on politicking. That is why political class mostly gets away with wrongdoings.

In 1636, the Mughal emperor Shahjahan signed a deal with the Deccani states of Golconda, and Bijapur, promising not to conquer these states in future. This promise was reneged by Shahjahan himself.  But Golconda, and Bijapur kingdoms continued to exhibit some sovereignty although they accepted the Mughal suzerainty. Then came emperor Aurangzeb.

He wanted both these states to confront Marathas, who were hassling his troops in guerrilla warfare. They refused, and Aurangzeb for the time being lost interest.

Bijapur, and Golconda states acted as a buffer zone between the Mughals and Maratha. The latter would plunder these two states, and sometimes join hands with them against the Mughals. Aurangzeb’s repeated offer to Bijapur to join hands with him to destroy the Maratha was not acceptable to Bijapur, as it considered Maratha power the sword arm against the Mughals. Emperor Aurangzeb tried to win over its nobility through diplomacy, but failed.

By 1684, Aurangzeb’s patience had given up. He thought that the Maratha power can be crushed only by conquering Deccani states. Since, he was orthodox, and it was against Islamic principles to attack, conquer, and annex, fellow Muslim lands, he accused them of handing over the entire control of the affairs to infidels. On this pretext he annexed both of them to the Mughal kingdom, but it was the start of winding up of the empire.

With Bijapur, and Golconda annexed, Aurangzeb succeeded in to arrest Sambhaji, Shivaji’s son. According to historians, some nobles of Aurangzeb’s court asked him to spare his life in lieu of him surrendering all forts. Aurangzeb was then at his zenith of power, he refused, and in fact, paraded and humiliated Sambhaji before executing him. Aurangzeb also spurned Marathas offer for peace. When the emperor dead in 1707, the Mughal empire virtually controlled the subcontinent including parts of modern Afghanistan.   

But in just 50 years the same Marathas against which the Mughals spend huge human resources, and money were now protectors of the Mughal court. No Mughal king could sit on the throne without the support of the Marathas.

What at that time seemed lost of the very rebellion turned into a game changer with the Marathas becoming kingmakers at the Mughal court!

If you think I am drawing analogy between Kashmir and the events of past, yes, you are right. The Indian state has abrogated the last vestige of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, the merger, as per the Indian state, is complete.

The abrogation of Article 370, et al, made many Kashmiris to think that Pakistan would come to their rescue. In fact, in the first month rumours were circulating that Pakistani forces have entered inside Gulmarg, in the next month it was said they are in Gangbal area as well. But as August faded, September waned, and the month of October passed too people began to realise that all these rumours of Pakistan coming to their rescue were jokes, and nothing else. It may have eroded a significant junk of pro-Pakistan constituency in Kashmir. Because for years pro Pakistan constituency in Kashmir kept repeating a lie that it was because of Pakistan that India’s hands are tied!  

The other thing that this abrogation did was to erode pro-India constituency. So far these pro-India politicians were relevant in Kashmir because of the Article 370. It is no secret in Kashmir that sometimes both pro-India and pro-Pakistan people cooperated with each other to benefit themselves. Now both these constituencies have been hit. Just like Bijapur, and Golconda were conquered, annexed, and forgotten. Not that these constituencies will disappear altogether they will be like the Zimbabwean cricket team whom no one wants to host.

Apart from it both these constituency were fulcrum against the global jihadist movement in Kashmir. Both these constituencies were deadly against global jihadist movement. The Indian state may have unintentionally helped global jihadist organisations to consolidate in Kashmir.

What is in favour of the state?

The smooth transition from abrogation of the Article 370 to union territory with not many shots being fired has helped the state to link its activities with the past ones, such as, do away with the visa at entry points of Kashmir, removal of the post of president, prime minister of Kashmir, arrest of Sheikh Abdullah, et al, where the Kashmiri population did nothing and accepted everything as fait accompli
It projects Kashmiris as docile, and only when instigated by external forces do they rise up. 

The narrative in Kashmir has been changed from azaadi to clutch domicile law.

Kashmiris will remain busy nit-picking domicile law, earlier they were engrossed on the validity of instrument of accession, which came first––­­tribal warlords, or the Indian army ––forgetting that partition of the united India was on the basis of communal politics where Hindu majority states were to join India, and Muslim majority with Pakistan.

The state is also not missing the point that when all communications were put to halt in Kashmir, the same Kashmiris, men and women, young and old, readily went to police stations to call their kith and kin.  Same about journalists who didn’t protest when a few computers were installed in a government controlled space for them to work from, and were also monitored by the police (https://www.newslaundry.com/2020/02/05/a-panopticon-of-fear-and-rumours-inside-kashmirs-media-centre-during-lockdown)  

No nation state wants to redraw borders. Just look at Syria where old adversaries, USA, Russia, Iran came together to throttle any plans to redraw borders.    

Pakistan, as it seems, is also exhausted. Last year its prime minister repeatedly tried to instigate the people of Kashmir to protest, but no one took his word (https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/besieged-kashmiris-hail-imran-khan-speech-190927105940765.html)

Pro-Pakistan militants are also sitting ducks these days as Pakistan has refrained them from killing any combatant (https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/calls-for-jihad-in-kashmir-against-kashmiris-cause-pak-interest-imran-khan/article29811581.ece)

What is the state up against?

The state is up against a new determined militant minority who owe allegiance to global Khilafat, and not to any nation state.

The ideology of global Khalifat is spreading in Kashmir, and as police officials have repeatedly said that they can kill militants but are helpless in front of radical ideology (https://thewire.in/security/zakir-musa-new-extremism-kashmir-killed).

With the abrogation of Article 370, the state has made the whole of India as the battlefield for global movements, as al Qaeda in the Indian subcontinent has frequently said “key to victory in Kashmir lay in attacking Indian cities” (https://www.news18.com/news/india/kashmir-al-qaeda-wing-says-delhi-riots-taliban-peace-agreement-have-energised-jihad-2523689.html). Many voices that were against Kashmir being dragged into pan-Islamic conflict will be silenced now.

The Taliban’s victory in Afghanistan without support from any Muslim country is going to spur on huge number of radicals in Kashmir. 


But at this time the state will not see it like that.